<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: AFCA itself a pawn in some scams	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://financialnewswire.com.au/financial-planning/afca-itself-a-pawn-in-some-scams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://financialnewswire.com.au/financial-planning/afca-itself-a-pawn-in-some-scams/</link>
	<description>A specialist news site for financial advisers, fund managers, superannuation executives and suppliers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:04:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy		</title>
		<link>https://financialnewswire.com.au/financial-planning/afca-itself-a-pawn-in-some-scams/#comment-7451</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cea.demo-sites.me/?p=159210#comment-7451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There should be a AFCA compliant lodgement fee of $50 just to help stop the vexatious and frivolous complaints. The Singaporean version of AFCA charges a similar fee. 

As for Scammers gaming AFCA - no one should be surprised reading that this is happening. AFCA wanting to get in on the scam act itself is just a power grab on their behalf. Seriously what does AFCA think they can do here exactly? 99% of scams happen in a foreign  jurisdiction where AFAC have zero authority. It&#039;s grand standing and worse gives false hope to actual victims of financial scams.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There should be a AFCA compliant lodgement fee of $50 just to help stop the vexatious and frivolous complaints. The Singaporean version of AFCA charges a similar fee. </p>
<p>As for Scammers gaming AFCA &#8211; no one should be surprised reading that this is happening. AFCA wanting to get in on the scam act itself is just a power grab on their behalf. Seriously what does AFCA think they can do here exactly? 99% of scams happen in a foreign  jurisdiction where AFAC have zero authority. It&#8217;s grand standing and worse gives false hope to actual victims of financial scams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scrammer		</title>
		<link>https://financialnewswire.com.au/financial-planning/afca-itself-a-pawn-in-some-scams/#comment-7450</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scrammer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 22:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cea.demo-sites.me/?p=159210#comment-7450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[FACA or FUCUP is what it should be called as its F@@d up Advisers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FACA or FUCUP is what it should be called as its F@@d up Advisers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Out of Control		</title>
		<link>https://financialnewswire.com.au/financial-planning/afca-itself-a-pawn-in-some-scams/#comment-7447</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Out of Control]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cea.demo-sites.me/?p=159210#comment-7447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AFCA the Kangaroo court open for scammers too, free access of course. 
This hypothetical returns paying anti adviser abomination needs its wings clipped.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFCA the Kangaroo court open for scammers too, free access of course.<br />
This hypothetical returns paying anti adviser abomination needs its wings clipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
