Skip to main content
Inspector Clouseau character

‘Failed’ super funds accused of misleading messaging

By Mike Taylor24 June 2022

The communications of some ‘failed’ superannuation funds may have risked confusing or misleading members about their product’s performance in the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) performance test, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

ASIC released its review of trustee communications about their MySuper performance test failures in which 13 products were deemed to have failed last year.

The review found that trustees whose products failed “generally complied with the legal obligations to notify their members of the failed test and to disclose the failed test on their website”.

“However, the communication strategies of some trustees may have risked confusing or misleading members about their product’s performance,” the ASIC report said.

“ASIC’s REP 729 identifies communication strategies of concern including, for example:

  • publishing the MySuper product’s failure of the test on a webpage less likely to be visited by persons interested in the product;
  • highlighting other performance measures that were more favourable, such as recent positive past performance figures; or
  • criticising aspects of the test to suggest it was not relevant to the particular product.

Commenting on the findinghs, ASIC Commissioner Danielle Press said, “The performance test supports transparency of product performance for members so they can make more informed investment decisions. Trustees should act in their members’ best financial interests by being transparent about the performance of their product. They should communicate their performance test results to members in a balanced, clear and factual way”.

“Communication strategies that don’t prominently disclose the test result or obscure the importance of a failed result in some way are not acceptable,” she said.

Mike Taylor

Mike Taylor

Managing Editor/Publisher, Financial Newswire

Subscribe to comments
Be notified of
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bee Real
1 month ago

Some of the misleading wording from the funds was reminiscent of ASIC’s own language when confronted with their ‘under performance’ and it came to light about the corruption of government funds paying personal lawyer expenses, huge incentives paid on top of salaries, the ‘gifts’ by union super funds into sports corporate lounges (which incidentally my understanding is that ASIC’s gift register still isn’t publicly viewable?), reciprocal lack of policing those same funds and giving them a clean bill of health during doddery inept Hayne’s RC etc etc etc.

Somehow though ASIC escaped any further persecution or media spotlight. Funny how a corrupt authority policing other professionals or institutions not only don’t hold themselves up to the same standards, but still publicly lambast others that do as they have done and continue to do.

Same same but different
1 month ago

Hostplus “”””””Balance Fund””””” 100% growth and they don’t update the unit prices have a look at their returns you cannot tell me their isn’t funny business going on all the unlisted assets we will check the values in 12 months nothing to see.

apparently past performance is important now.