Grattan attacks super tax at Budget time again

Little more than a month out from the Federal Budget the Grattan Institute has renewed its arguments around superannuation taxation stating that tax breaks on superannuation are excessively generous and should be wound back.

The Institute has issued a new report, Super savings: Practical policies for fairer superannuation and a stronger budget which it says shows that super tax breaks cost the budget $45 billion a year – or about 2% of GDP – and will soon exceed the cost of the Age Pension.

It claims these tax breaks are not well targeted in circumstances where two-thirds of their value benefit the top 20% of income earners, who are already saving enough for their retirement.

It said retirees with big superannuation accounts pay much less tax per dollar of super earnings than younger workers do on their wages.

Much of the boost to super balances from tax breaks is never spent. By 2060, one-third of all withdrawals from super will be via bequests – up from one-fifth today.

“Super has become a taxpayer-funded inheritance scheme,” according to the lead author of the report and Grattan Institute Economic Policy Program Director, Brendan Coates.

“Reining in super tax breaks is a responsible way to boost government revenues in a world where the government has committed to higher spending on defence, healthcare, aged care, and disability care.”

The report recommends a reform package that would save the budget more than $11.5 billion a year, including:

• Raising Division 293 tax, which curbs tax breaks to high-income earners on their pre-tax super contributions, from 30 per cent to 35 per cent, and lowering the income threshold at which the tax applies, from $250,000 to $220,000 a year. This would save the budget about $1.1 billion a year and stop many high-income earners benefitting from larger tax breaks, per dollar contributed to their super, than low- and middle-income earners.
• Lowering the cap on pre-tax super contributions, from $27,500 to $20,000 a year. This would save about $1.6 billion a year, mostly by reducing voluntary contributions made by older, wealthier Australians to minimise their income tax bills.
• Abolishing carry-forward provisions and government co-contributions, which were intended to encourage catch-up contributions but in fact facilitate tax minimisation. This would save about $1.1 billion a year.
• Taxing all superannuation earnings in retirement at 15% – the same rate that applies to super earnings before retirement. This would save more than $5.3 billion a year.

Taxing earnings on super accounts larger than $2 million – rather than $3 million as proposed by the Albanese Government – at 30 per cent. This would save about $3 billion a year, compared to about $2 billion a year under the government’s plan.

“The warning signs are everywhere: Australia’s current superannuation system is unfair and unsustainable,” Coates said. “The reforms we recommend would make the system fairer and the budget stronger.”