Comments on: Super funds seek standardised 10-year past performance

By: Terry G

Terry G — Thu, 12 Feb 2026 03:36:25 +0000

In reply to ISF fake valuations. Members who paid $1.20 for something that was actually worth $1.00 should be compensated if the valuations were incorrect. Where are all the class action vultures?

By: Brad

Brad — Thu, 12 Feb 2026 03:02:28 +0000

Lying pigs! They want to use 10 years because they are getting beaten now that they are all “HUGGING the INDEX” to avoid a bad mark in the performance test at the end of the year.

By: ISF fake valuations

ISF fake valuations — Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:22:57 +0000

In reply to anonymous.

Yep ISF aren’t looking so good now ASIC has actually started a small look at Unlisted Asset valuations.
So ISFs want to force everyone to look at their inflated historical data when ASIC and APRA let ISF’s make up the Unlisted Asset values on the back of a coaster at the Canberra brewery, that ensured the ISF’s topped returns tables.

15 year look back ASIC & APRA should be doing a DEEP DIVE into ISF’s historical and mythical Unlisted Asset values.

By: Terry G

Terry G — Wed, 11 Feb 2026 23:42:29 +0000

How convenient.

I’m almost always of the view that anything that SMC and ASFA demand should be put in the bin immediately.

Absolutely sick and tired of them having their $0.02 to say on everything and lobbying to tilt the rules to favour their members despite arguably massive hypocrisy.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Wed, 11 Feb 2026 21:23:10 +0000

So now ASFA, and probably all the other adviser hating organisations, want to change the performance test to suit themselves due no doubt to their large allocation to unlisted investments