Super withdrawal proposal risks gender economic abuse: WIS

Industry organisation, Women in Super, has raised concerns over the proposal allowing withdrawal of superannuation to purchase a home, saying it increases the risks of economic abuse for single and divorced women.
Women in Super chief executive, Jo Kowalczyk, said the proposal shines a light on the inadequate funding for crisis support and affordable housing that is unable to support single and divorced women and may result in them falling into poverty or having to endure violence.
“The shortfall in funding for women who have separated, for affordable housing and crisis support, must be urgently addressed,” she said.
“Women should not be forced to rob from their economic security in retirement in order to leave a bad relationship.”
“The proposal would effectively take Australian women back to the situation before the introduction of a universal superannuation system, where super was the preserve of men and older single women were expected to survive on the Age Pension alone.”
Kowalczyk said the proposal could enable the economic abuse of even more women by former partners, pressuring them to withdraw from their retirement savings. According to Women in Super, 16 per cent of Australian women have been subject to economic abuse by an intimate partner.
“There is no way to protect women from the risk of economic abuse under this proposal,” Kowalczyk said.
What a load of Poppycock ! Rules for Thee but not for ME ! If csnnot see the legal conflict…
So it's acceptable for a Superannuation fund using members' money to waste it in this instance? As trustee's, they have…
Four Years to process multiple Binding Death Nomination form. Four months is the minimum processing time for Australia SuperDeducting Insurance…
This is the equivalent of saying that no Fund should be disadvantaged by the NALI/NALE legislation... oh wait that legislation…
Are these guys for real? All they worry about is advertising and can't even pay a claim in a reasonable…