ASIC extends date for adviser registration requirement

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has extended the date by which financial advisers, providing personal advice to retail clients, must be registered to 1 October, 2023.
The regulator said a further delay to the registration requirement will allow time for:
- Parliament to consider the improvements proposed by the Bill;
- ASIC to assist the financial advice industry to understand and comply with the registration requirement by issuing regulatory guidance and conducting webinars; and
- Australian financial service (AFS) licensees to understand the registration requirement and to make necessary applications to register their relevant providers with ASIC.
ASIC said that the registration requirement was new and it was separate, and in addition to, the pre-existing requirements for an AFS licensee to appoint a relevant provider to the Financial Advisers Register after they have been authorised. Provisional Relevant Providers cannot be registered.
After the Treasury Laws Amendment Bill 2023 has passed into law ASIC will issue regulatory guidance, conduct webinars, and open the registration portal to commence accepting applications for registration.
The requirement for financial advisers to be registered was introduced by the Financial Sector Reform (Hayne Commission Response – Better Advice) Act 2021, in response to Recommendation 2.10 of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.
In November 2022, Government announced that it would delay the financial adviser registration requirement until 1 July 2023 to allow certain improvements to be made.
On 16 February 2023, Government introduced these improvements by way of the Treasury Laws Amendment (2023 Measures No.1) Bill 2023 (the Bill) and, following this, on 9 March 2023, the Bill was referred to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee for inquiry and report.
The report is due by 2 June 2023.









ASIC / Hayne train wreck, please explain what is the point of yet another Adviser Registration / Register ?
Surely ASIC can simply use the FAR that exists ? If not why not ?
Surely ASIC can copy the FAR to the new double up Register ?
No doubt Advisers will be asked to pay some more Rego fees.
Why is the point ASIC ??????