Govt urged to end super re-contribution loophole

The loophole which has created one of the most commonly-used post-retirement superannuation strategies needs to be closed.
A strong call has been made to the Government to close the door on re-contribution strategies to avoid death benefits.
The call is being made by the Grattan Institute ahead of the Federal Budget as part of its arguments for a general winding back of generous superannuation tax concessions.
The re-contribution strategy is one of the most common utilised by advisers when dealing with clients entering the retirement phase.
“When the beneficiary of a superannuation account dies, any outstanding superannuation balance is paid out as a ‘death benefit’. While most super death benefits paid to dependants are not taxed, benefits paid to non-dependants are often taxed,” the Grattan analysis said.
“But the precise tax payable on death benefits also depends on whether the super fund has already paid taxes on contributions and fund earnings. Only the pre-tax contributions portion of a super bequest is taxable, at 17%. The post-tax contributions portion is tax-free.”
“A common strategy to reduce the taxable portion is to withdraw a lump sum after preservation age (but before the age of 75, when contributions can no longer be made) and re-contribute it as a post-tax contribution.”
“This effectively transforms taxable super into tax-free super, reducing the tax liability on the bequest.”
“This loophole should be closed. A system could be implemented whereby debits are recorded on lump-sum withdrawals commensurate with the taxable share of the withdrawal and are factored into the tax-free component of the ultimate bequest if there are subsequent post-tax contributions.”
“This would be a reform for the long-term: most of those re-contributing are aged between 60 and 69, and so can expect to live on average for about another 20 years,” the Grattan analysis said.
The Grattan paper said “superannuation has become a taxpayer-subsidised inheritance scheme.
“A significant share of superannuation is held in accounts with very large balances that are unlikely to be spent down in retirement. In February this year, the Federal Government announced that from 2025-26, the earnings on balances bigger than $3 million would be taxed at 30% (instead of 15%). This is projected to affect about 80,000 people and trim earnings tax breaks for those with very-high balances by about $2 billion a year once the policy is fully operational,” it said.









If CSLR is the ‘last resort’ please tell us ASIC what measures have been taken before you hit innocent advisers…
ASIC, So who do you think are going to pay your $200m in fines when this lot can’t even pay…
When, oh when, are you going to do an analysis of "wholesale only" advisers who are NOT on the FAR…
I’ve just paid the $1,295 CSLR levy, and honestly, I’m frustrated that my hard-earned money is being used to cover…
Just remind us again how much money a super trustee spent on their 40th birthday party using member funds? What…