Labor’s financial services report card = 30/100

With the Government now in caretaker mode and with Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, having ended his Parliamentary career it is worth considering what the Albanese Government has delivered to financial services over the past three years.
To do so, Financial Newswire reviewed all of Jones’ announcement over his three years in office and examined what were the issues he sought to address and what, if anything, he achieved.
And what is clear is that Jones started off declaring good intentions, including reviewing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) funding model declaring that “the Albanese Government is committed to ensuring that ASIC, and the frameworks it uses, are sustainable, in step with the times, and appropriate for today’s financial sector”.
The outcome? The industry funding model remained largely unchanged.
Jones also announced consultation on financial adviser professional standards, noting that the Government had made an election commitment to remove tertiary education for financial advisers who had passed the exam, had 10 years’ experience and a clean record.
The outcome? Largely delivered.
When it came to one of the legacies of the former Coalition Government – the Your Future, Your Super performance test, Jones announced a consultation process to look at “any unintended consequences and implementation issues” noting that “the second annual performance test for MySuper products which revealed that 96 per cent of MySuper members are in a well-performing fund”.
The outcome? Some minor methodology tweaks.
Jones then moved to “advancing” the recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission and said the Government had finalised legislation to implement “recommendations to extend the Banking Executive Accountability Regime to all APRA-regulated entities and to provide for joint administration between APRA and ASIC”
Perhaps more importantly, the same announcement said the Government would be “delivering on its election commitment to establish a Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) to ensure Australians continue to have trust and confidence in the financial system external dispute resolution framework”.
The outcome? An industry funding model for the CSLR which is inappropriately focused on advisers and unsustainable.
In early 2023, Jones dealt with another legacy issue from the former Coalition Government, the release of the Quality of Advice Review chaired by Michelle Levy. A few months later he said the Government “will adopt the bulk of the QAR recommendations. He announced three streams of activity, the first of which involved removing onerous red tape, the second of which promised to expand access to retirement income advice and the third of which was intended to “explore new channels for advice”.
The outcome? Two years’ later the Government managed to deliver only the first stream. The second stream of the now Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) legislation is still yet to pass the Parliament and there is barely any discussion of the third stream.
Responding to concerns about the number of Managed Investment Schemes sitting at the heart of product failures, Jones in August 2023 released a consultation paper examining the regulatory framework for MISs and whether it remained fit for purpose.
Tied up in that review was the key question of whether the wholesale client thresholds remain appropriate.
The outcome? Little or no change, with MISs still not part of funding the CSLR regime.
In October, 2023, the Government announced the release of draft legislation which, in line with a Budget commitment, would reduce the tax concessionality of superannuation balances over $3 million. Not so prominently revealed in the minister’s statement was that the legislation also entailed taxing unrealised capital gains.
The outcome? The legislation became stuck in the Senate for the very reason that it entailed the taxation of unrealised capital gains – something which was rejected by the Federal Opposition and proved unpalatable to a significant cohort of the Senate cross-bench.
In November 2023, Jones was part of a Government announcement above legislating to enshrine the objective of superannuation which was regarded as many as the creation of a bulwark against future Governments repeating the Morrison Government’s Covid-19 early access scheme.
The outcome? Delivered.
In September 2024 the Government announced it would be moving to legislate for payday superannuation in a move designed to become effective from 1 July, next year.
The Government’s move reflected consistent pressure from the industry superannuation funds sector.
The outcome? Set to be delivered.
In January, this year, Jones also announced Government plans to introduce mandatory and enforceable services standards for all large superannuation funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
The Government’s announcement came in the wake of revelations that some large funds had fallen short on handling death benefit claims resulting in regulatory action and fines.
The outcome? Still in the development stage.
One of Jones’ last major announcements has been a Treasury Review of the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR).
The outcome? The election intervened.
Jones’ last major announcement was the broad outline of the second tranche of the DBFO legislation.
The outcome? The election intervened
Very generous Mike. As a practising adviser I would give them zero.
My costs are going through the roof and I was recently audited by one of the 4 platforms I use. A direct consequence of their sneaky DBFO, which was designed to make our life harder, but dressed up as red tape relief.
If the other platforms follow, and it becomes a regular occurrence, it will wipe out the only practical benefit they have delivered, which is the removal of FDS, which saves me a small amount of time.
The idea that FSG’s don’t have to be given if they are available on your website has gone up in smoke. After consulting with our compliance expert, we came to the conclusion that the most practical solution to meet the requirements set out in ASIC’s guidelines, is to continue giving them as we have always done.
Labor has been a pathetic disappointment. Although the Coalition was very bad also thanks to O’Dwyer and Hume. Both have zero interest in our profession it seems, except bastardising it to benefit their big financial backers.
9 years of Frydenberg killing advisers with some help from Hume, LNP.
Now 3 years of Jones only increasing costs of advice.
12 years of Canberra’s political and bureaucratic madness on Advisers.
And these morons wonder why Advice is hard to get and expensive ?
Red tape maniacs and they wonder why there is no productivity in Australia ?
Which platform ?
It was an Insignia platform, but I’ve heard others are doing the same thing. PS. There weren’t any red flags. They just said this would be a regular check they will be doing. They wanted advice documents proving service was delivered. They were specifically looking at the scope of advice and the breakdown of fees. Thankfully I am always very careful about these aspects of my advice documents.
Invoice clients flat fees directly, and collect payment via direct debit from their bank account. Makes all the platform fee related problems go away.
We do this for some of our clients. However if we did it across the board, it would increase our costs, which are already far higher than they should be. On top of that, our superannuation clients (without an SMSF) would miss out on a 15% tax saving if we invoiced them personally for super advice.
Surprising that the costs of invoicing & direct debit would be higher than the admin overhead associated with platform based fee collection. Payment for super advice from non super bank accounts also removes all the work and compliance risk associated with apportioning/justifying the super component. Clients may not get a tax deduction, but their fees needn’t be as high because they’re not covering the costs of additional complexity and risk. Maybe about 15% of the super advice component less!
Thanks.
Appreciated.
30 points ? How does he get 30 points. ?
No red tape relief.
FSG fiasco.
SoA changing to CAR (Name change only as far as I can see).
Potential return of vertically integrated conflicted advice (I recall a RC a while ago).
Potential return of Govt sactioned fee for no service.
Costs of running a practice are through the roof and going higher (what ever hapened to lowering the cost of advice). ?
Attempt to confuse and trick the public with the term “Qualified Adviser”.
CSLR – Joke
ASIC levy – Joke.
IT’S ALL ABOUT UNION SUPERFUND FUM RETENTION.
It’s a disgrace – All of it.
I’m giving him ZERO.
This analysis only focuses on the things Jones actually announced. There is a lot of fixing needed in many other areas of financial services regulation as well. A competent minister should have been able to fix most of it within 3 years.
3/10 for the stuff he announced. 0/90 for the stuff he never even considered. So 3/100 overall.
Generous
When marking University papers I always gave the students 20 points for getting the name of the Lecturer and Course correct, and a bonus point for turning up, achievements in themselves…… so Mike, I can see where you’re going with the 30 out of 100.
This has been the worst Government in my 25 years of being a Financial Adviser. And I”m sure the 600,000 Australians scammed last year, and pushed out of getting advice would agree. At least with the previous Government I could say they were just poorly advised, blaming consultation (FSC) and self-interested and conflicted submissions from the FPA, and they went broke and had to merge. Even the FAAA is “very disappointed” and that’s harsh fighting words..ha ha..
This Government can only be summed up with “Qualified Adviser” and taking 3 years to fix the hot mess of Advice by changing the name of a document called an SoA and replacing it with Client Advice Record.
Minus 100.
In my opinion, he’s achieved nothing other than to look after friends of the ALP.
A rubbish minister who leaves a rubbish legacy.
Cheerio Stephen.