ASIC LEI consultation highlights push for global alignment

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) new consultation paper on the legal entity identifier (LEI) has stressed increased push for global regulatory harmony for Australian derivative transaction reporting and a better adoption of international best practice.
APIR Systems’ chief executive, Chris Donohoe, said that ASIC’s proposed regulations found the LEI as the only acceptable identifier to be used by Australian legal entities in OTC reporting, reflecting the trends from offshore jurisdictions.
“APIR has been a long-standing supporter of legislation that aligns Australia with international best practice and facilitates global regulatory harmony,” Donohoe said.
The LEI is a 20-character alphanumeric code connecting an entity to key reference data, including information about the entity’s ownership structure, which needs to be renewed annually in order to ensure the currency of the reported transaction data.
According to Donohoe, the LEI lapse rate in Australia was close to 45%, compared with 35% globally.
“The proposed changes would help bring Australia in line with global benchmarks,” he said.
“Many Australian transaction reporting entities captured under ASICs Derivative Transaction Rules (Reporting) are a subsidiary of an international brand, therefore being brought into the global alignment is a win for the domestic financial services industry.”
The consultation period would close 8 July 2022, with proposed legislation slated to be effective from 1 October 2023.









Good Lord ASIC. What a statement of the bleeding obvious What the hell did you expect. This is exactly what…
I keep asking this question in forums but have failed so far to get an answer, particularly from CALI. Why…
I would have thought Senator McKim that the potential capital misallocation of trillions of dollars of Australian's retirement savings, caused…
Government must gurantee returns and refund any loses if they set the performance test, you cannot run this without any…
The surprising aspect to this revised model is why he didn't align the lower threshold with the indexed Transfer Balance…