Skip to main content

Impact of super fund IM insourcing confirmed

Mike Taylor

Mike Taylor

Managing Editor and Publisher

24 October 2023
Road sign - in-house versus outsource

The decision by superannuation funds to take investment management in-house has played a role in Australian asset managers falling down the global rankings scale.

The latest rankings, undertaken by the Willis Towers Watson Thinking Ahead Institute reveals that not one single Australian asset manager has made it into the global Top 20, with Macquarie Group our best sitting at number 48 in the rankings.

Thereafter, just 25 asset managers make it into the Top 500.

Australian asset managers ranked by total AUM, in U.S. millions.

Ranking Global Ranking Manager AUM
1
48 Macquarie Group $542,791
2 140 IFM Investors $143,169
3 172 Pendal Group4 $104,500
4 177 MLC Asset Management $98,465
5 198 AMP Capital $84,340
6 224 Challenger $67,500
7 225 QIC2 $67,024
8 240 Charter Hall $59,758
9 244 Perpetual $58,535
10 246 Pinnacle Investment $57,761
11 260 Goodman Group $53,986
12 277 Magellan Asset Management $45,322
13 278 Westpac Banking4 $44,548
14 283 Dexus $42,306
15 317 Lendlease Asset Management $32,595
16 341 QBE $28,167
17 360 Navigator Global Investments $24,500
18 366 One Investment $23,767
19 376 GPT Group $22,002
20 389 ANZ Banking Group4 $20,531
21 402 Morrison $18,277
22 434 Ardea Investment Management $15,236
23 467 Platinum Asset Management9 $12,902
24 470 Yarra Capital Management $12,732
25 483 Alphinity Investment2 $11,408

 

Overall, it was a tough year for investment managers globally with the research reveraling a 13.7% drop, the first significant decline in assets since the Global Financial Crisis.

The analysis revealed there were some differences by region. Japanese managers within the world’s largest 500 fared much better than average with a 5.5% decrease in assets, while North American asset managers saw a 14.2% decrease and Europe (including the UK) experienced an above-average 16.8% decrease. Australian managers experienced a relatively resilient year, with their AUM decreasing by 6.6%, affected also by the weakening Australian dollar.

The research also revealed the continued evolution of active versus passive assets under management among the largest investment managers. Investment in passively managed funds grew to account for 34.7% of the total, as of 2022, up 4 per centage points from the previous year.

Notably, among the world’s largest managers, this still leaves a considerable majority of 65.3% actively managed assets.

Australian managers included in the largest 500 with meaningful active equity exposure also suffered from the move from active to passive strategies, as some superannuation funds continued to de-risk their portfolios under the Your Future Your Super (YFYS) regime.

Commenting on the data, WTW Australia head of research and co-portfolio manager, Leslie Mao said even though Australian equities performed better than many other developed markets in 2022, local managers with more exposure to equity business saw their rankings decline.

By comparison, managers with exposure to alternative asset classes such as infrastructure and real estate stacked up reasonably well. Macquarie Group recorded a seven place gain in rank to be in the world’s top 50 this year, up from 55 the year before.

“Another factor that saw a drop in AUM among Australian managers is the ongoing consolidation and internalisation happening within superannuation funds. Some managers, regardless of how they performed, lost assets during this period.”

Subscribe to comments
Be notified of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments