ANZ hit with $25 million Federal Court penalty

ANZ has been hit with a $25 million penalty for failing to provide promised benefits to customers with offset transaction accounts.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that the Federal Court has ordered ANZ to pay a $25 million penalty for failing to provide certain benefits it had agreed to give customers with offset transaction accounts or under a ‘Breakfree’ package.
The Court found ANZ failed to provide benefits such as fee waivers and interest rate discounts to approximately 689,000 customer accounts for over 20 years, with customers affected up until September 2021.
Commenting on the court’s decision, ASIC deputy chair, Sarah Court said, ‘Having the necessary systems and processes to ensure customers are given the benefits they are promised is not an optional extra, it is a requirement. ANZ is a large financial institution that for many years failed to prioritise and deploy the systems and processes necessary to fulfil its obligations.’
ASIC said the matter was the final civil case filed following ASIC’s enforcement investigations arising from the Financial Services Royal Commission. The total penalties ordered by the Courts from ASIC’s Royal Commission litigation are over $160 million. There are seven further Royal Commission cases remaining before the Courts.
“The penalties handed down from ASIC’s Financial Services Royal Commission enforcement work should act as a reminder to financial institutions that they must invest in their systems to ensure consumers are not adversely affected or harmed,” Court said.
ASIC said ANZ’s Breakfree package, introduced in 2003, offered fee waivers, interest rate discounts on eligible ANZ products such as home loans, credit cards and transaction accounts and other benefits in exchange for paying an annual fee. ANZ’s offset customers were entitled to interest rate reductions on eligible home and commercial loans. These benefits were not always passed on to the customer.
The Court found that ANZ had contravened the ASIC Act, the Corporations Act, and the National Consumer Credit Protection Act. In particular, that ANZ made false or misleading representations to certain customers when it represented that it had, and would continue to have, adequate systems and processes to provide them with the contractual benefits they were entitled to.









Is it not a cost of completing the transaction? Why should it be removed from any analysis, applicable govt charges…
Misleading figures. We’d have millions and millions removed in our client base with LS. Almost 100% came straight back in…
Financial planners, you know exactly what will happen next. Get your wallets out- Cslr bill coming your way!
Another day and yet another shouty SMC story running about trying to push regulators to enter union super into Australian…
These funds should be a lot more concerned about their investment returns, which are starting to look very sick. Waiting…