Aussie domestic investors ‘foolish’ to ignore global risks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0a39/d0a39ecac8455dde246582f5e2e3163afeb46bf9" alt="Global risks, crises investments Primary Markets"
Australian domestic investors cannot ignore global risks such as economic downturns, geopolitical tensions and conflicts, and exchange rate fluctuations, which have real potential to adversely affect local investments, advises Jamie Green, executive chair of Primary Markets.
These global risks have “very real potential to adversely impact various aspects of individual businesses, the local economy, financial markets and, in fact, the entire economy more broadly,” Green said, warning that investors would be “foolish” to ignore them.
He urged investors to embrace wide-ranging diversification in their portfolios to effectively “insulate themselves from global risks as much as possible”.
“This includes diversification across asset classes, geographies, industries and even company sizes,” he said.
“Investing in companies of varying sizes, including large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap stocks is prudent as different-sized companies can respond differently to economic and market conditions.”
Green cited the Covid crisis as an example of the deleterious consequences of disrupted supply chains, which can negatively affect local businesses that rely on international trade or sourcing for inputs.
He also urged investors, regardless of whether they seek advice, to “conduct their own research on the companies they are looking to invest in and be aware of global economic developments, as well as trends in various industries”.
Investors can also employ risk management strategies such as currency hedging, Green added, which reduces exposure to currency fluctuations, and dollar cost averaging, which is the practice of investing a fixed amount of money at regular intervals regardless of market conditions.
PrimaryMarkets is a dedicated trading platform for unlisted companies.
100% just ask this financial planner they banned for alleged churning based on incomplete & manipulated information. I guess this…
non-disclosed to members in any way they would understand, as it will be paid via an investment reserve set aside…
ASIC hardly need to stonewall questioning of them, it’s benign stuff. Anyone who’s watched Bragg in action and especially those…
Who pays the fine? The members?
And yet they publish bannings and such for ‘crimes’ of far less…for smaller fry advisers…