Australian ETF industry decline continues
BetaShares’ latest Australian exchange traded fund (ETF) industry review has revealed another drop in flows for the second month in a row, falling by 1.3 per cent (around $1.7 billion) to end February at $130.1 billion.
The report said it was a mix of falling global share markets and weak flows that caused the decline, with the industry now down around $7 billion from the highs in December 2021.
Investors were cautious amid geopolitical tension, inflation fears and market volatility, contributing only $212 million this month which was the lowest level of net flows recorded in the last five years.
Despite the market volatility, ETF trading value on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) remained high at $10.2 billion, reaching its third-highest monthly level on record. Industry growth in the last 12 months also remained steady at 34 per cent, recording a total of $32.8 billion net growth.
There were five new product launches in February, with three ETFs from BetaShares, the Online Retail and E-Commerce ETF (IBUY), the Video Games and Esports ETF (GAME), and a yield enhanced Australian Composite Bond ETF (OZBD). Munro and Resolution Capital also launched new active ETFs.
Exposures in the gold and oil mining sectors topped performance charts, with BetaShares’ own hedged global gold miners ETF (MNRS) recording an 11.8 per cent monthly return.
Flow-on effects from Magellan’s decline also saw the International Equities category in net outflow of -$300 million, after the Magellan Global Fund recorded close to $700 million in outflow. Australian Equities products saw around $318 million in net inflow, outperforming global equities.
All in the name of access to advice.... But in fully qualified adviser land... oh no, you cannot have that....…
How is HESTA paying for the adjustments? Who pays for the market moves? All members? This is not communicated in…
The whole concept of another class of financial advisers who don't need to meet the same red-tape requirements, or education…
Yeah, typical - one set of rules for Advisers and non Industry Super and a completely different set of rules…
No doubt that I'll be going into the Xmas break wondering why in the hell I bothered doing a masters…