Betashares launches Aussie-hedged US top 500 ETF
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e674/2e674f2b10bb99fde4d8efc22260081095254839" alt="Currency hedged"
ETF specialist fund manager Betashares has launched an Australian currency hedged version of its popular S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF on the Australian stock exchange.
The Betashares S&P 500 Equal Weight Currency Hedged ETF (ASX: HQUS), like its parent fund, provides investors exposure to 500 top listed US companies, with equal weighting for each holding.
Uniquely, however, the HQUS hedges foreign currency exposure back to the Australian dollar, which, Betashares says, serves to minimise the effect of currency fluctuations on investor returns and performance.
Betashares chief executive Alex Vynokur further notes that the fund’s unique structure “reduces some of the concentration risks associated with its market capitalisation weighted equivalent” – the S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (ASX: QUS).
The just-launched fund currently counts just over $1.13 million in net assets; its annual management fee is 0.32%.
The HQUS parent fund, QUS, has grown to over $380 million in funds under management since inception at the end of 2020. The fund has returned 8.41% per annum (minus fees) over the last three years, in line with the index figure of 8.39%.
With investments spread across the top 500 index, Betashares says the QUS can avoid investor overexposure to ‘mega cap’ companies, which now account for more than a quarter (28%) of the S&P 500 index by market capitalisation.
“By removing the link between the price of a share and its weight in the index, the equal weight approach aims to outperform comparable traditional [indices] over time by selling higher priced shares while buying those which are lower priced, through regular rebalancing,” Betashares writes in its QUS factsheet.
With the launch of HQUS, Betashares now has 23 currency hedged ETFs in-market, accounting for $4.4 billion in funds under management in that category.
Collectively, Betashares currently manages over $39 billion in assets.
100% just ask this financial planner they banned for alleged churning based on incomplete & manipulated information. I guess this…
non-disclosed to members in any way they would understand, as it will be paid via an investment reserve set aside…
ASIC hardly need to stonewall questioning of them, it’s benign stuff. Anyone who’s watched Bragg in action and especially those…
Who pays the fine? The members?
And yet they publish bannings and such for ‘crimes’ of far less…for smaller fry advisers…