10% of insurance inside super underwritten

The superannuation lobby has confirmed the degree to which insurance inside superannuation will be largely immune to the implications to genetic testing, because so little of it is underwritten.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has pointed to Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) data indicating that only around 10% of insurance inside superannuation is actually underwritten.
“Only a minority of cover through superannuation is underwritten,” it said. “APRA data indicates that only around 10 per cent had higher cover than default levels which involved underwriting. However, this amounts to at least 900,000 individuals.”
“That said, in many cases the underwritten level of cover will be below the amounts set out in the Financial Services Council moratorium document,” ASFA said in a submission to Treasury supporting a ban on the use of adverse genetic testing results in life insurance.
“Only a small proportion of those with underwritten policies will have taken a relevant genetic test. A recent Australian study of individuals aged over 45 indicated that around 5 per cent had undertaken disease related genetic testing.”
“Sector research released in 2021 indicated that around 10 per cent of individuals who disclosed a genetic test result had insurance cover offered on less favourable terms or had cover declined.”
“Running through the various percentages, it is likely that currently no more than a few thousand of the 9 million or so individuals with group life cover through superannuation currently would have life cover subject to additional terms or would have cover declined because of a genetic test result.
“This suggests that the aggregate cost to insurers providing group cover through superannuation of banning use of adverse genetic testing will be quite low, especially given that only a proportion of individuals with an adverse genetic test result will go on to have an insurance claim.,” ASFA said.
“However, use of genetic testing may well increase in the future, especially if there is a ban on the use of adverse genetic test results in the underwriting of insurance. The incidence of both individually underwritten insurance and higher levels of cover are greater outside of superannuation.”
Take it to ASIC
The $500 impact threshold is too low
ASIC are too busy putting all their resources into regulating financial advisers, for very little benefit, rather than focusing on…
And yet HESTA can get away with not allocating any employer contributions to members for around two months starting in…
Why hasn't there been comment on HESTA preventing access to all super accounts for 6 weeks starting mid April. And…