APRA moves impose expertise requirements on super fund boards

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has announced proposed changes aimed at strengthening prudential governance for superannuation funds, insurers and banks.
The proposed changes, if approved, will have a direct impact on the make-up of some superannuation fund boards, particularly with respect to financial expertise.
The proposed changes include:
- lifting requirements for boards to ensure they have the right mix of skills and experience to deliver the entity’s strategy
- raising minimum standards around the fitness and propriety of responsible persons, and requiring significant financial institutions to engage with APRA on succession planning and potential appointments
- extending existing requirements for superannuation trustees in relation to managing conflicts of interest to banking and insurance
- strengthening board independence, especially in relation to entities that are part of a group
- clarifying APRA’s expectations around the roles of boards, the chair and senior management
- introducing a lifetime tenure limit of 10 years for non-executive directors at an APRA-regulated entity.
Commenting on the changes, APRA chair, John Lonsdale said effective governance is fundamental to financial stability.
“The boards of Australia’s banks, insurers and superannuation trustees have enormous responsibilities when it comes to protecting the financial interests of households and businesses. Well-governed institutions are likely to be more resilient in times of stress, while poor governance can create weakness that leads to misconduct, losses and failures. It is no coincidence that almost 80 per cent of entities subject to heightened risk-based APRA supervision have underlying governance problems.”









I think these numbers are too low. Especially if you live in major cities. I try to ensure none of…
Are Interprac / Sequoia going to pay the 10’s of $$ millions in AFCA complaints ? Even after Macquarie &…
Always back self interest when a body is marketing a submission to the government
In other words the system is achieving what the government wanted to happen.
Every day I come on here it feels like it is just the SMC trying to lobby to make one…