Skip to main content

APRA warns choice funds on “phoenixing” and other rorts

Mike Taylor

Mike Taylor

Managing Editor/Publisher, Financial Newswire

21 April 2023
Phoenix

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has made clear to superannuation funds offering “choice” or trustee-directed products (TDPs) that they will not be able to “phoenix” those products to handle the Your Future, Your Super performance test.

The regulator has used an information paper to point out what will and will not pass muster under the next iteration of the performance test regime which is scheduled to come into force in August.

And the message to the funds is that while they will be allowed to combine the performance history of TDPs they will not be allowed to game the system.

Under the heading, “Avoiding product ‘phoenixing”, the information paper said that, “In line with the policy intent, the choice of when to or how to combine the performance of multiple TDPs must not facilitate situations where trustees intentionally close a product and open a new but similar product to avoid being assessed in the performance test.”

“Combining the performance of multiple TDPs should use the actual return history of products where possible, avoiding using amalgamated data or creating blended returns using data from multiple TDPs,” the information paper said.

“Where two or more products are combined into a new product, a predecessor product should be identified. The following criteria will be considered when determining the predecessor product:

– Continuity of control – for example where there is consolidation of products under RSE licensees within the same corporate group, APRA will consider identifying the predecessor TDP as the one with the same RSE licensee or management as the successor TDP;

– Continuity of product design – for example, where two products are consolidated into one, APRA will consider identifying the predecessor TDP as the one with materially similar product design (such as the investment strategy) as the successor TDP;

– Members impacted – for example, where two products are consolidated into one, APRA will consider identifying the predecessor TDP as the one with the majority of members.

The information paper also said that combining the performance of multiple TDPs should not allow the performance achieved by a continuing TDP to be replaced with the performance achieved by another TDP in the product range.

“Where an RSE licensee replaces the investment strategy of a TDP with the investment strategy of another product within the product range, the performance of the TDP will not be replaced by the performance of the other product in the range.”

Subscribe to comments
Be notified of
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
test test
2 years ago

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) what about compare the pair ads this is actually what they do…..

Compare 17 industry funds against 174 retail funds of course the smaller number of products average is better because they are average over a larger number of products so the median is always going to be worst. ACCC should do their jobs and stop this type of advertising.

Just sayin
2 years ago

Finally APRA have belled the cat. Retail funds far more so than industry, corporate or public sector funds have a history of product phoenixing to bury poor performance and high fee structures. Ask any of the research firms to produce a list of retail products that have a 20, 15, 10 let alone 5 year track record – its a very small one.

Steve
2 years ago

Yes, but it didn’t stop AustralianSuper phoenixing the failed WestScheme Super fund from Western Australia. It’s quite an art hiding all of the failed assets within the successor fund annual report. lol

Fact checker
2 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Not anywhere near comparative – that was a merger and makes entire sense to not duplicate investment options.