Confirmed: Miniscule numbers accessing FHSSS

Fewer than 3% of superannuation fund members have sought to access the First Home Super Savers Scheme which is likely to be in jeopardy under the Government’s proposed Objective of Superannuation arrangements.
As the Government and the Federal Opposition prepare to battle it out over both the early release of superannuation and the use of superannuation for home ownership, superannuation fund executives have confirmed to Financial Newswire that nearly a year after it was introduced, the FHSSS the level of interest from members has been relatively modest.
And the relatively modest uptake comes despite the fact that virtually all the major superannuation funds have actively promoted the availability of the FHSSS which came into effect as of 1 July, last year.
Definitive figures around take-up of the scheme will be included in the May Federal Budget.
Under the scheme, introduced by the former Morrison Coalition Government, superannuation fund members are eligible to access up to $50,000 from their voluntary contributions on the basis of having contributed up to $15,000 a year and $50,000 in total.
Superannuation funds such as Aware Super have promoted the scheme to members on the basis that the “good part is that because you’re saving through super, you pay less than if you were saving outside of super, which means you could build a bigger deposit more quickly”.
“To start saving for your deposit, all you have to do is make additional contributions (either by making a salary sacrifice before-tax contribution or voluntary after-tax contribution) into your super each year, within the annual contribution limits,” the superannuation fund said.
For its part, retail industry fund, REST Super has promoted the scheme to members on the basis that it will allow them to save faster.
“First home buyers may be able to use their super as a tax-effective way to save for part of their home deposit. The concessional tax treatment of super may help first home buyers save faster,” it said.
However, superannuation fund chief executives and consultants told Financial Newswire that, at most, they had seen less than two dozen member applications relating to the scheme.
“The numbers are not even high enough to warrant serious inclusion on the fund trustee board papers,” one consultant said.
The level of interest in the scheme appeared to depend on membership demographics, with funds with higher numbers of younger, trades-oriented members reporting higher take-up than those with older, white collar members.
The only person I have recommended use the FHSSS is my daughter and that is because I haven’t made a recommendation to her, I have simply suggested that her mother tell her about it. The benefit outweighs the cost of getting an adviser to help you and it is too complex for most people to fully understand. Another example of a reasonably good idea in theory being poorly implemented.
This needs time. It really is only a part of the story when they say they haven’t seen large numbers of take up. There is a lack of education on this firstly. Its also a very new scheme and the opportunity to save any amount of worth hasn’t been seen yet, especially when its limited to $15,000 per annum. I can assure you, $15,000 wont get you a deposit on anything right now, so people need to have time. They need deposit plus costs saved. With the price of housing here on the Gold Coast, to buy anything at all you need 5% plus costs… realistically that’s around $60K in savings when you factor in deposit, stamp duty and lenders mortgage insurance on a $600,000 property. So, at $15,000 per annum, we need 4 years of savings in our out of super to get there…