Super withdrawal proposal risks gender economic abuse: WIS

Industry organisation, Women in Super, has raised concerns over the proposal allowing withdrawal of superannuation to purchase a home, saying it increases the risks of economic abuse for single and divorced women.
Women in Super chief executive, Jo Kowalczyk, said the proposal shines a light on the inadequate funding for crisis support and affordable housing that is unable to support single and divorced women and may result in them falling into poverty or having to endure violence.
“The shortfall in funding for women who have separated, for affordable housing and crisis support, must be urgently addressed,” she said.
“Women should not be forced to rob from their economic security in retirement in order to leave a bad relationship.”
“The proposal would effectively take Australian women back to the situation before the introduction of a universal superannuation system, where super was the preserve of men and older single women were expected to survive on the Age Pension alone.”
Kowalczyk said the proposal could enable the economic abuse of even more women by former partners, pressuring them to withdraw from their retirement savings. According to Women in Super, 16 per cent of Australian women have been subject to economic abuse by an intimate partner.
“There is no way to protect women from the risk of economic abuse under this proposal,” Kowalczyk said.









When, oh when, are you going to do an analysis of "wholesale only" advisers who are NOT on the FAR…
I’ve just paid the $1,295 CSLR levy, and honestly, I’m frustrated that my hard-earned money is being used to cover…
Just remind us again how much money a super trustee spent on their 40th birthday party using member funds? What…
Wow, they put the fund on a super platform at SQM's lowest investment grade?? Just wow.
Scum bag Jones pulled Govts funding of 1st year CSLR out. Scum bag Jones exempted MIS and failed to deliver…