APRA signals focus on retirement products performance
First it was superannuation fund performance heatmaps, then it was the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) super investment performance test and now the regulator is signalling it may apply performance measurement to retirement income products.
In a submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee review of the legislation intended to deliver the Retirement Income Covenant, APRA has signalled the degree to which it intends holding superannuation funds to account over the retirement income products they provide under the covenant arrangement.
In its submission it said it intended to communicate with the industry to “make clear APRA’s expectations of RSE (superannuation fund) licensees in implementing the covenant”.
“This communication will also highlight the expansion in supervisory focus to the retirement phase expected to follow the commencement of the covenant,” it said.
“Supervision of RSE licensees’ compliance with the covenant would apply in accordance with APRA’s existing prudential framework structure, with the expectation that RSE licensees have a strong focus on the retirement income needs of their beneficiaries, that member outcomes are optimised and retirement income strategies are developed in the best financial interests of the beneficiaries,” APRA’s submission said.
“Over time, APRA would consider expanding its data collection for retirement income products and the development of further tools that would give a sharper focus on the performance of these products.”
“APRA intends that its prudential framework changes will support compliance with the Retirement Income Covenant. APRA will continue to work closely with the Treasury, ASIC and the ATO in ensuring the success of these reforms.”
All in the name of access to advice.... But in fully qualified adviser land... oh no, you cannot have that....…
How is HESTA paying for the adjustments? Who pays for the market moves? All members? This is not communicated in…
The whole concept of another class of financial advisers who don't need to meet the same red-tape requirements, or education…
Yeah, typical - one set of rules for Advisers and non Industry Super and a completely different set of rules…
No doubt that I'll be going into the Xmas break wondering why in the hell I bothered doing a masters…