APRA identifies super fund expenditure shortcomings

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has identified weaknesses in superannuation funds expenditures and putting members interests first including a lack of rigour entering into agreements and a lack of robust governance and oversight.
In a letter to superannuation funds following intensified scrutiny of fund-level expenditure particularly focused on 14 superannuation funds, the regulator has set out its expectations and what it sees as better practice.
It listed areas for improvement as including lack of rigour when entering into agreements, decisions to proceed with contracted expenditure without demonstrating a clear rationale and looking at the activities of peers rather than delivering outcomes to members.
While APRA’s scrutiny of the 14 superannuation funds identified areas for improvement, APRA did not specify which funds needed to make improvements or why.
It said that it had communicated directly with the funds and would continue to monitor them as part of ongoing supervision.
The regulator’s letter outlined its high level expectations of funds as including:
- A robust decision-making approach with clear links to Strategic Objectives and expected financial outcomes for members (e.g. estimated dollar value benefit or saving);
- A comprehensive expenditure management framework with clear definitions and expectations, thresholds and approval requirements inclusive of a risk assessment;
- Periodic monitoring that utilises member outcomes focused success metrics to measure improved or declined financial outcomes to members, and acting on insights further to these metrics; and
- Reporting that is supported by evidence and data with clear links to member impact.









LOL - the current number isn't the floor. It's just a pause as more declines are incoming tks to insane…
Someone is fudging the numbers on the number of active advisers available to provide advice! While there may be in…
When they leave a licensee they come off the list. When they commence with a new one they come back…
You have a reversal in number. 15203 and another 15023…
How does an adviser shifting licensees add to a new adviser list ?