ASIC initiates court action against Diversa

The actions of a financial adviser under scrutiny by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has led to the regulator pursuing civil penalty proceedings against superannuation trustee, Diversa Trustees Limited.
ASIC is alleging that between March 2019 and December 2020, Diversa, a superannuation trustee, or its representatives:
- were aware that ASIC was investigating a business run by financial adviser Mr Nizi Bhandari for contraventions of the law;
- despite its knowledge of these matters, did not take adequate action and continued to allow Mr Bhandari to put clients into Diversa’s superannuation product; and
- continued to allow the payment of fees from the superannuation fund to Bhandari.
ASIC said that Diversa, which operates as a professional superannuation trustee, relies on ‘promoters’ or third parties to run many of the day-to-day operations of its fund.
“ASIC alleges that the OneVue company group acted on behalf of Diversa and facilitated Mr Bhandari putting clients into Diversa products via Mr Bhandari’s company, The Australian Dealer Group Pty Ltd,” ASIC said.
It said that it was also alleging that Diversa did not act efficiently, honestly and fairly because it failed to provide proper oversight of the activities of OneVue nor take appropriate action regarding the activities of The Australian Dealer Group and Bhandari involving its superannuation fund.









It’s not a bonus. The tax reserves are funds that should have been allocated to members already. Its members money…
So for those who want to exit the fund, they get punished by denying them their own money? Is this…
I am delighted that I have SMSF and I get everything that I am entitled to
So previously these Industry Funds actually charged members Tax (stole $$) that they should NOT have paid when going into…
A fairer way would be to allocate the money to members regardless of whether they stay with them or not.