APRA says some salary sacrificing advice breaches the sole purpose test

Some financial advice provided to superannuation fund members around salary sacrificing into superannuation may actually be in breach of the sole purpose test, according to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
Asked by the chairman of the Senate Economics Committee, West Australian Senator, Slade Brockman whether the sole purpose test applied to advice on reducing expenditure to enable a member to salary sacrifice into super, APRA said such advice would only be compliant if paid for from monies held outside of superannuation.
“If the advice was being paid for by the individual with monies held outside of superannuation, the sole purpose test would not apply,” APRA said.
“If the advice was paid for by the superannuation fund trustee with the consent of the member, then it is likely to inconsistent with the sole purpose test,” the regulator said.
Asked by Brockman whether an extension of intrafund advice to allow for the provision of advice to the spouse of a member would be in breach of the sole purpose test, APRA said it was likely to be a breach.
“Only members of the fund can receive intrafund advice paid for out of superannuation,” APRA said.









So the FAAA and professional adviser bodies should and must call for this funding to be deducted from this ASIC…
Yet bother reason I’m glad I left the FAAA. Haven’t represented the betterment of their members for a long time.…
Why isn't the FAAA making the profession better for their existing members? As it currently stands you would be mad…
Using migrants to increase financial adviser numbers is not in the interests of the FAAA membership. Is this something the…
And have rocks in their head.