Frydenberg’s deafening failure to fix the ASIC levy

The Federal Treasurer, Josh Frydenberg is the person ultimately capable of fixing the inequities contained in the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) levy and he has thus far done nothing.
That is the clear message from the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) in a submission to ASIC dealing with funding of the levy which notes that while Government parliamentarians and others see the flaws, the Treasurer has remained silent and inactive.
The AFA has noted just now long it has been lobbying with respect to the ASIC funding model which it stated was “a very flawed model”.
“Over the course of the last 16 months, since the commencement of the COVID 19 pandemic, we have approached the Government on several occasions to address the issue of cost pressures on the financial advice sector and the inequity of the ASIC Funding Model, including:
- In April 2020, in the context of COVID 19, we requested that the ASIC Funding Levy be waived for that year. Despite extensive relief measures in other areas, nothing happened.
- In July 2020, following the release of the 2019/20 CRIS and the significant jump in the projected ASIC Funding Levy to $1,571 per adviser, we wrote to the Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology and the Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister and Cabinet, who is responsible for red tape reduction, and requested action to address this problem.
- In December 2020 we wrote again to the Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology and to ASIC seeking an explanation of how the ASIC Funding Levy had leaped to $2,426 for the 2019/20 year (from $1,571 in the projection) and asked for this to be explained and the funding model fixed to ensure a more equitable outcome.
- We have also raised the issue of the ASIC Funding Levy with several other politicians.
“We have had several discussions over this time with relevant Ministers and their staff. We have also observed that the ASIC Funding Levy has been a subject debated during Senate Estimates hearings and other Parliamentary hearings. Most recently at the House of Representatives Economics Committee it generated very strong comments.”
“It is evident that it is broadly understood that it is an incredibly inequitable and unfair model and that small business financial advisers are being poorly impacted, yet even now some 16 months since we first requested action, nothing has changed, and there is no indication that the person ultimately responsible for this will do anything to address the underlying flaws in this model or the unfair treatment of financial advisers,” the AFA submission said.
“We thank ASIC for releasing the Cost Recovery Implementation Statement for 2020/21, however we are asking the Government to fix what is a very flawed model. It is essential that the Government listen to this feedback from the financial advice sector and act.”
What a load of Poppycock ! Rules for Thee but not for ME ! If csnnot see the legal conflict…
So it's acceptable for a Superannuation fund using members' money to waste it in this instance? As trustee's, they have…
Four Years to process multiple Binding Death Nomination form. Four months is the minimum processing time for Australia SuperDeducting Insurance…
This is the equivalent of saying that no Fund should be disadvantaged by the NALI/NALE legislation... oh wait that legislation…
Are these guys for real? All they worry about is advertising and can't even pay a claim in a reasonable…