Warning on re-emergence of vertical integration from QAR

The organisation representing AMP financial advisers is calling for “guardrail” to be put in place to prevent the Quality of Advice Review (QAR) recommendations giving rise to the emergence of vertical integration.
The Advisers Association (TAA) has specifically pointed to the potential for the QAR recommendations related to non-relevant providers giving ‘good advice’ as creating the potential for a re-emergence of vertically integrated financial services models.
TAA chief executive, Neil Macdonald said that while his organisation broadly supported the QAR recommendations it believed great care needed to be taken before implementing some of them “or we may face a back-to-the-future scenario that did not serve Australians well”.
He said the guardrails should be around who should be permitted to deliver personal financial advice, the extent of the advice they give, the minimum education and qualifications they hold and the obligation to provide ‘good advice’.
“It is very clear, particularly as a large per centage of the population nears retirement, that we need to enable more people to give personal financial advice,” Macdonald said. “But while the advice profession continues to debate what the future should look like, industry funds have continued giving advice and are taking over the role previously played by the banks.”
However, he said the relatively low Statement of Advice (SOA) production from the industry funds sector appeared to indicate that general advice is being provided, where personal advice is likely required, especially in preparation for retirement.
“There is a world of difference between giving people general information and giving them personal financial advice that meets their needs,” Macdonald said “‘There is also a risk that general advice will continue to be provided instead of ‘good’ personal advice, and that doesn’t address the issues of the past.”
He said the QAR recommendation to expand the definition of personal advice to require non-relevant providers to provide ‘good advice’ represented a very important consumer protection that had to be enforced if there was to be no Best Interests Duty.
“If it is not, then complex retirement advice could easily be provided to members of a super fund, without any consideration of issues that profoundly impact consumers in retirement – for example, Centrelink benefits, who and when to move to pension phase, etc,” Macdonald said.









A 15% decrease in TPD premiums! Well, that is the opposite of what they are saying about retail TPD. AIA…
The advice community has no political capital and that is all that matters to the narcissists in Canberra. Why do…
and I am a risk writer only no fees, so the CSLR is a cruel blow to us, I like…
Too bad the guard dog was asleep on the couch when the burglars from Shield broke in and walked straight…
Wow! And Telstra walked away from the Equip merger because it wasn't in the best interests of it's members! Hard…