Lonsec launches governance offer amid product failures

In what appears to be a case of “out of misfortune comes opportunity”, research and ratings house, Lonsec, has launched a new Governance Solution to help clients avoid the mis-steps which led to exposures to Shield and First Guardian.
Lonsec announced the launch of Lonsec Investment Governance Solutions which it is marketing as a capability designed to help compliance and governance teams, research functions and investment teams respond earlier to emerging risks and maintain clear, defensible audit trails.
The capability has been embedded within Lonsec’s iRate product with the company saying it brings together key governance indicators including ratings changes, performance and fee monitoring, and other material signals into customisable dashboards and reports.
It says the solution is suited to organisations that need to demonstrate consistent, evidence-based oversight of their approved product list or investment menu, such as financial advice licensees, platforms, trustees, investment committtees and governance teams.
Commenting on the capability, Lonsec chief executive, Lorraine Robinson said that, across advice licensees, platforms and trustees, expectations around governance have never been higher.
“Advisers and clients want to know that investment options are being monitored consistently, and decisions are made with care and accountability. The Lonsec Investment Governance Solution provides the framework and transparency that supports better decision making and greater confidence at every level,” she said.
Lonsec head of sales, Anna Schofield said that with recent high-profile failings in the industry, the focus on investment governance had intensified.
“By embedding governance signals directly within iRate, the Lonsec Investment Governance Solution gives investment teams and advisers greater clarity and confidence in decision making, with a clear and defensible record of how and why decisions were made. Our solution delivers real peace of mind, not just for investment committees, but for advisers and their clients.”









Right, so we (advisers) ended up remunerating a bunch of Canberra Bureaucrats who never lost any money? No wonder they…
I note Treasury are yet to make submissions public. They are known for doing this as transparency is not their…
And every input (except the FSC) wants MIS as front line CSLR levy payers. Plus: MISPlatforms Research Responsible Entities Super…
100% agree with this. "But for" demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of capital investing. Until now it has been…
More rubbish out of Canberra funded by taxpayers. Another public institution that should not be considered as trusted. Disgusting.