The grim top to bottom picture for active managers
The latest S&P Australia Persistence Scorecard has confirmed just how hard it has been for active managers over the past five years and how fleeting outperformance can be.
The bottom line finding of the Scorecard is that among the top-quartile funds in all reported Australian fund categories over the five-year period ending in December 2020, only 22.4% maintained their top-quartile status in the subsequent five-year period, while 46.6% dropped to the bottom quartile or were merged or liquidated.
It found that bonds funds provided an exception, with more funds staying in the top quartile than falling to the bottom quartile or being merged or liquidated.
The S&P report said that among active funds, persistent outperformance was generally difficult to find in equity strategies whereas, conversely fixed income funds showed some signs of skill, with a number of funds consistently outranking their peers over the past five years.
It said that among Australia’s top-performing equity funds, most failed to maintain their outperformance in subsequent years. Of the 75 Global Equity General funds ranked in the top quartile in 2023, only 12 (16.0%) remained in the top quartile in 2024 and 2025.
“The results were worse for Australian Equity General funds, with only 5 (7.1%) of the 70 top-quartile funds sustaining their status for the following two consecutive years,” the report said.
So there are another 700 cases with similar growth profiles to the lead generation induced explosion of funds that Shield…
Interesting they didn't name the worse offenders, which means it is the union funds.
In my 30+ year experience, the 'laggards' seem to consistently be ISF's in handling death benefit claims. The RSF's that…
Lead generation is either acceptable or unacceptable. Whilst I have a personal view in relation to lead generation I don't…
Yeh CALI, dodgy lead generators for Life Insurance (that is often linked to Superannuation) funnelling into dodgy direct life policies…