256 day death benefit time-frame = $50.75 compensation offer

A claimed 256 day delay in the payment of a death benefit by AustralianSuper has prompted a Federal politician to query why there is no mandated minimum time for funds to pay death beneficiaries.
Victorian Liberal member, Mary Aldred told the Parliament she was concerned it had taken 256 days for a constituent to receive a death benefit after the death of her husband.
What is more, she told the Parliament that in the face of numerous queries and requests on the part of the bereaved wife, AustralianSuper offered $50.75 in compensation.
“That’s $50.75 for holding over $200,000 for over eight months. Imagine the returns Helen could have received, the interest if she’d stuck that money in the bank,” Aldred told the House of Reprsentatives.
“Worse still, Helen’s husband Alan wanted to access the terminal illness early payout on that super before he died to gift to his children in person. The emotional toll inflicted on Alan in his final weeks fighting to access his own money is an absolute disgrace by AustralianSuper.” She said.
“Helen has since appealed the $50.75 compensation and been sent another letter from AustralianSuper avoiding any clarification or acknowledgement or the disastrous and distressing handling of her late husband’s superannuation,” Aldred said.
Aldred told the house that she had queried the status of mandated minimum time-frames with respect to death benefits with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and had been told there is not one.
She said she had been told by the regulator that death benefits were required to be paid as soon as it practicable.
Aldred referenced the Minister for Financial Services, Daniel Mulino, in stating she believed the death benefit payments time-frames should be reviewed by the minister.









Scrap it
If this does happen it will represent the biggest case of intergenerational theft ever. Older/pension members getting their balances artificially…
Didn't AusSuper lose over a Billion dollars in a failed investment in Plurasight?
There would be NO advice "vacuum" if the insane levels of red tape were removed. This conversation is utter nonsense.…
It is absolute rubbish to link industry fund conflicted advice with the prevention of fraud like Shield.