Super funds could own 60% of Australian listed equities

Superannuation funds own approximately 35% of the stocks listed on the Australian Securities exchange, with at least half of that shareholding owned by industry superannuation funds.
And, if current superannuation trends continue, then their level of ownership could nearly double to around 60% of domestic equities in about 40 years’ time.
At the same time as Government back-benchers on Parliamentary committees express concern about capital concentration and as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) presses for more superannuation fund mergers, analysis by Deloitte has confirmed just how much of Australia’s listed companies are already owned by super funds.
The work, undertaken by Deloitte superannuation consultant and actuary, Diane Somerville points not only to the level of domestic equities ownership by funds regulated by APRA, but also the level of ownership in terms of self-managed superannuation funds.
Discussing Deloitte’s findings with Financial Newswire, Somerville said that if the current dynamics driving superannuation fund investment on the ASX continued then it was possible that it could grow to reach 60%.
Those dynamics included further increases in the superannuation guarantee (SG) which would in turn drive further inflows.
The bottom line for superannuation funds was that notwithstanding the uncertainties driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, the ASX had continued to perform well and that domestic equities were attractive because of the Australian taxation system, not least the imputation credit regime.
The Deloitte assessment of superannuation fund ASX holdings has come at the same time as consultants have confirmed a flurry of merger discussions resulting directly from the outcome of APRA’s recent superannuation fund performance test.
The performance test saw 13 funds deemed to have ‘failed’ resulting in them having this month compulsorily writing to their members informing them of the failure and the reasons for it having occurred.
Take it to ASIC
The $500 impact threshold is too low
ASIC are too busy putting all their resources into regulating financial advisers, for very little benefit, rather than focusing on…
And yet HESTA can get away with not allocating any employer contributions to members for around two months starting in…
Why hasn't there been comment on HESTA preventing access to all super accounts for 6 weeks starting mid April. And…